On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 10:36:18AM +0300, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: >connections on my 7.0-RELEASE boxes. First of all, no NFS-related >TCP connection are showed in `sockstat -4c' (not on the client, nor on >the server), though tcpdump clearly shows that there is TCP data >exchange with alredy existing connection. I see the same on 6.3 so I don't think this is a 7.0 effect. >10:30:57.280063 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 46128, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 208) 192.168.0.32.834052435 > 192.168.0.1.2049: 156 access [|nfs] >10:30:57.280279 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 24588, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 176) 192.168.0.1.2049 > 192.168.0.32.834052435: reply ok 124 access [|nfs] > >what the heck is 834052435 in 192.168.0.32.834052435 > 192.168.0.1.2049 >line? It's the NFS transaction ID. See the section "NFS Requests and Replies" in tcpdump(1). -- Peter Jeremy Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:28 UTC