----- Original Message ---- > From: Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh_at_gmail.com> > To: Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri <wearabnet_at_yahoo.ca> > Cc: Ian FREISLICH <ianf_at_clue.co.za>; FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org>; FreeBSD STABLE <freebsd-stable_at_freebsd.org> > Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 4:39:23 AM > Subject: Re: Packet corruption in re0 > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 10:41:48AM -0700, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > > ----- Original Message ---- > > > From: Pyun YongHyeon > > > To: Ian FREISLICH > > > Cc: FreeBSD Current ; Robert Backhaus > > > > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 8:12:03 AM > > > Subject: Re: Packet corruption in re0 > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:43:22AM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote: > > > > Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 01:18:18PM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote: > > > > > > Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 02:47:43PM +1000, Robert Backhaus wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Pyun YongHyeon > > > wr > > > > ote: > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:03:02AM +1000, Robert Backhaus > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I am experiencing roughly 15% packet corruption on the > re > > > inter > > > > face > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > > my freebsd 7/amd64 box. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > FreeBSD gw.flexi.robbak.com 7.0-PRERELEASE FreeBSD > > > 7.0-PRERELEA > > > > SE #8 > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > Tue Feb 5 09:49:55 EST 2008 > > > > > > > > > > root_at_gw.flexi.robbak.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GW amd64 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just to make troubleshooting difficult, this problem > only > > > shows > > > > up > > > > > > > > > > after the system has been up for roughly 36 hours, > depending > > > on > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > amount of traffic. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I didn't take a look attached tcpdump files but I guess the > > > > > > > > > instability issue was fixed in HEAD. It's not yet MFCed but > > > > > > > > > I'll handle it in a week. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would you try re(4) in HEAD? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > OK, I'll do that. What is the best way to do that? csupping to > "." > > > se > > > > ems a > > > > > > > > bit drastic, and I don't do much with cvs proper. I take it > that I > > > sh > > > > ould > > > > > > use > > > > > > > > anon-cvs to grab the directory, but I don't quite know how. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Copy sys/dev/re/if_re.c, sys/pci/if_rlreg.h in HEAD to your box. > > > > > > > Due to lack of m_defrag(9) in 7-PRERELEASE/RC, you also have to > add > > > > > > > that function to if_re.c(Copy m_defrag() in sys/kern/uipc_mbuf.c > on > > > > > > > HEAD/RELENG_7 to if_re.c). That would make it build on your box. > > > > > > > > > > > > This doesn't solve the problem that I'm seeing on re(4) interfaces. > > > > > > It basically shows up as quagga establishing OSPF neighours as > > > > > > "Exchange/DR" when VLAN hardware tagging is enabled. I'm running > > > > > > OSPF over 802.1Q vlans. Neighbours are correctly negotiated once > > > > > > VLAN hardware tagging is disabled on the interface. > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll do more debugging. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hmm. That sounds like different issue to me. I guess I din't change > > > > > any semantics in VLAN H/W tagging. Do you still the same VLAN H/W > > > > > tagging related issues on RELENG_7? > > > > > > > > > > To narrow down the issue it would be even better to know which parts > > > > > of H/W assistance was broken. For example, > > > > > - Disable checksum offload for VLAN interface first and check > > > > > whether quagga works. > > > > > > > > You can only disable offload on the parent interface. > > > > > > > > > - Disable checksum offload for parent interface and check again. > > > > > If you can post tcpdump output for broken conntection it may help a > > > > > lot to diagnose the issue. > > > > > > > > The only flag affecting this behaviour is vlanhwtag. Various > > > > permutations of the interface flags make no difference to this > > > > behaviour as long as hardware tagging is enabled. > > > > > > > > It seems like it's corrupting large packets on transmit when vlanhwtag > > > > is enabled. From the tcpdump output it looks like a padding or > > > > packet length issue. > > > > > > > > Here's what tcpdump on the re(4) device thinks it's transmitting: > > > > > > > > 00:08:a1:3c:32:9c > 00:90:fb:0c:89:7d, ethertype 802.1Q (0x8100), length > > > > 1510: vlan 1000, p 0, ethertype IPv4, 196.22.138.92 > 196.22.138.89: > OSPFv2, > > > Database Description, length: 1472 > > > > > > > > Here's what was actually recieved by the em(4) device on the > > > > neighbour. Note the absense of the 801.1Q header: > > > > > > > > 00:08:a1:3c:32:9c > 00:90:fb:0c:89:7d, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length > 1506: > > > 196.22.138.92 > 196.22.138.89: OSPFv2, Database Description, length: 1472 > > > > > > > > When vlanhwtagging is disabled, the re(4) device transmits: > > > > > > > > 00:90:fb:0c:89:7d > 00:08:a1:3c:32:9c, ethertype 802.1Q (0x8100), length > > > > 1510: vlan 1000, p 0, ethertype IPv4, 196.22.138.89 > 196.22.138.92: > OSPFv2, > > > Database Description, length: 1472 > > > > > > > > and the em(4) device recieves: > > > > > > > > 00:08:a1:3c:32:9c > 00:90:fb:0c:89:7d, ethertype 802.1Q (0x8100), length > > > > 1510: vlan 1000, p 0, ethertype IPv4, 196.22.138.92 > 196.22.138.89: > OSPFv2, > > > Database Description, length: 1472 > > > > > > > > Let me know if you need more detailed tcpdump output than I've provided. > > > > > > > > > > I guess I've found a VLAN hardware tagging bug in re(4). > > > Please try this one and let me know the result. > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/if_re.c > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/if_rlreg.h > > > > > > > Ian > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Ian Freislich > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > Pyun YongHyeon > > > > > > Pyun, > > > > I used it, and I got no bufer space available message, I run a server with > heavey http requests and named as we.. > > > > so I had to increase the buffer. > > > > Please try re(4) in HEAD. > I've just committed one important fix to PCIe variants of RealTek > chip. I guess re(4) in HEAD shall fix all known issues reported. > I'll MFC re(4) changes in a week. > > -- > Regards, > Pyun YongHyeon > Hello Pyun, I did fetch if_rlreg.h and if_re.c from HEAD, but it didn't compile in RELENG_7. machine -> /usr/src/sys/amd64/include rm -f .depend mkdep -f .depend -a -nostdinc -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -I. -I_at_ -I_at_/contrib/altq -I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ARABPE /usr/src/sys/modules/mfi/mfi_linux/../../../dev/mfi/mfi_linux.c ===> mii (depend) _at_ -> /usr/src/sys machine -> /usr/src/sys/amd64/include awk -f _at_/tools/makeobjops.awk _at_/dev/mii/miibus_if.m -c awk -f _at_/tools/makeobjops.awk _at_/dev/pci/pci_if.m -h awk -f _at_/tools/makeobjops.awk _at_/kern/device_if.m -h awk -f _at_/tools/miidevs2h.awk _at_/dev/mii/miidevs awk -f _at_/tools/makeobjops.awk _at_/dev/mii/miibus_if.m -h awk -f _at_/tools/makeobjops.awk _at_/kern/bus_if.m -h rm -f .depend mkdep -f .depend -a -nostdinc -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -I. -I_at_ -I_at_/contrib/altq -I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ARABPE /usr/src/sys/modules/mii/../../dev/mii/acphy.c /usr/src/sys/modules/mii/../../dev/mii/amphy.c /usr/src/sys/modules/mii/../../dev/mii/bmtphy.c /usr/src/sys/modules/mii/../../dev/mii/brgphy.c /usr/src/sys/modules/mii/../../dev/mii/ciphy.c /usr/src/sys/modules/mii/../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c /usr/src/sys/modules/mii/../../dev/mii/exphy.c /usr/src/sys/modules/mii/../../dev/mii/gentbi.c /usr/src/sys/modules/mii/../../dev/mii/icsphy.c /usr/src/sys/modules/mii/../../dev/mii/inphy.c /usr/src/sys/modules/mii/../../dev/mii/ip1000phy.c /usr/src/sys/modules/mii/../../dev/mii/lxtphy.c miibus_if.c /usr/src/sys/modules/mii/../../dev/mii/mii.c /usr/src/sys/modules/mii/../../dev/mii/mii_physubr.c /usr/src/sys/modules/mii/../../dev/mii/mlphy.c /usr/src/sys/modules/mii/../../dev/mii/nsgphy.c /usr/src/sys/modules/mii/../../dev/mii/nsphy.c /usr/src/sys/modules/mii/../../dev/mii/nsphyter.c /usr/src/sys/modules/mii/../../dev/mii/pnaphy.c /usr/src/sys/modules/mii/../../dev/mii/qsphy.c /usr/src/sys/modules/mii/../../dev/mii/rgephy.c /usr/src/sys/modules/mii/../../dev/mii/rlphy.c /usr/src/sys/modules/mii/../../dev/mii/ruephy.c /usr/src/sys/modules/mii/../../dev/mii/tdkphy.c /usr/src/sys/modules/mii/../../dev/mii/tlphy.c /usr/src/sys/modules/mii/../../dev/mii/ukphy.c /usr/src/sys/modules/mii/../../dev/mii/ukphy_subr.c /usr/src/sys/modules/mii/../../dev/mii/xmphy.c In file included from /usr/src/sys/modules/mii/../../dev/mii/rgephy.c:60: _at_/pci/if_rlreg.h:654:28: error: token ";" is not valid in preprocessor expressions _at_/pci/if_rlreg.h:1062:6: error: unterminated comment _at_/pci/if_rlreg.h:654:1: error: unterminated #if In file included from /usr/src/sys/modules/mii/../../dev/mii/rlphy.c:56: _at_/pci/if_rlreg.h:654:28: error: token ";" is not valid in preprocessor expressions _at_/pci/if_rlreg.h:1062:6: error: unterminated comment _at_/pci/if_rlreg.h:654:1: error: unterminated #if mkdep: compile failed *** Error code 1 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 2 2 errors *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error Could you please help with a patch could be applied in RELENG_7? This is urgent issue. --- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/ ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shoppingReceived on Fri Mar 28 2008 - 04:47:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:29 UTC