On Sat, 24 May 2008, Peter Wemm wrote: >> FWIW, I suspect fixing things like SLIP and kernel PPP are fairly trivial >> once tty locking is in place -- a per-softc mutex and a bit of locking in >> the obvious spots would likely do it without too much trouble. In some >> paths, it might be necessary to inject data via the netisr, if that's not >> already being done (probably is) to avoid input/output lock order issues. > > ppp_tty.c is kind of hairy and rather stale. I'd be inclined to drop strong > hints about switching to either userland ppp(8), or mpd + netgraph if you > want packets to stay in the kernel path and avoid userland. > > I was once a big user of pppd(8) and if_ppp.c / ppp_tty.c and maintained > them for a while. But I use ppp(8) now and have no interest in maintaining > it anymore. > > pppd/if_ppp.c/ppp_tty.c is many many years stale compared to what its vendor > supplies. > > And, I think if_sl.c could probably do the same treatment. It would > probably be a better investment in time to write a userland slip driver and > if_tun.c and/or write a ng_slip.c module While I'd be quite supportive of something along these lines, I think it probably is more work to port SLIP to userspace than to hack the current code a little bit to be MPSAFE, assuming it remains supported with the revised tty code. SLIP is a fairly straight-forward piece of code, as long as you don't try to understand the line discipline stuff. :-) Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of CambridgeReceived on Sun May 25 2008 - 07:58:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:31 UTC