2008/11/2, Yuri Pankov <yuri.pankov_at_gmail.com>: > On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 05:17:18PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote: > > 2008/11/2, Attilio Rao <attilio_at_freebsd.org>: > > > 2008/11/2, Yuri Pankov <yuri.pankov_at_gmail.com>: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Trying to mount nonexistent smb share with mount_smbfs leads to > > > > following panic: > > > > > > > > # mount_smbfs //yuri_at_lifebane/blahblah /mnt > > > > > > > > Unread portion of the kernel message buffer: > > > > smb_co_lock: recursive lock for object 1 > > > > panic: Lock (lockmgr) smb_vc not locked _at_ > > > > /usr/src/sys/modules/smbfs/../../netsmb/smb_conn.c:329. > > > > cpuid = 0 > > > > KDB: stack backtrace: > > > > db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2a > > > > panic() at panic+0x182 > > > > witness_assert() at witness_assert+0x21a > > > > __lockmgr_args() at __lockmgr_args+0x17a > > > > smb_co_put() at smb_co_put+0x76 > > > > smb_sm_lookup() at smb_sm_lookup+0xfe > > > > smb_usr_lookup() at smb_usr_lookup+0xcd > > > > nsmb_dev_ioctl() at nsmb_dev_ioctl+0x1f6 > > > > giant_ioctl() at giant_ioctl+0x75 > > > > devfs_ioctl_f() at devfs_ioctl_f+0x76 > > > > kern_ioctl() at kern_ioctl+0x92 > > > > ioctl() at ioctl+0xfd > > > > syscall() at syscall+0x1bf > > > > Xfast_syscall() at Xfast_syscall+0xab > > > > --- syscall (54, FreeBSD ELF64, ioctl), rip = 0x800939aec, rsp = > > > > 0x7fffffffe038, rbp = 0x7fffffffe450 --- > > > > Uptime: 6m46s > > > > Physical memory: 2032 MB > > > > > > > > > So, what is happening here is that smb_co_lock() is AFU. > > > Infact looking at the code: > > > int > > > smb_co_lock(struct smb_connobj *cp, int flags, struct thread *td) > > > { > > > ... > > > if (smb_co_lockstatus(cp, td) == LK_EXCLUSIVE && > > > (flags & LK_CANRECURSE) == 0) { > > > SMBERROR("recursive lock for object %d\n", cp->co_level); > > > return 0; > > > } > > > ... > > > > Yuri, > > could you please test this fix: > > http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/netsmb.diff > > > > and report if it works? > > You could get a KASSERT running but this is expected as I want to > > identify on the callers who passes a malformed request and fix it. > > > > Thanks, > > Attilio > > > > > > -- > > Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein > > > Thanks, Attilio. > > With this patch system doesn't panic anymore with nonexistent share > names (though I had to comment out smb_co_lockstatus prototype and > function to get rid of -Werror complaints). Still getting a LOR: > > netsmb_dev: loaded > lock order reversal: > 1st 0xffffff0021644008 smb_vc (smb_vc) _at_ > /usr/src/sys/modules/smbfs/../../netsmb/smb_conn.c:332 > 2nd 0xffffffff81037368 smbsm (smbsm) _at_ > /usr/src/sys/modules/smbfs/../../netsmb/smb_conn.c:348 > > KDB: stack backtrace: > db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2a > > _witness_debugger() at _witness_debugger+0x2e > witness_checkorder() at witness_checkorder+0x81e > __lockmgr_args() at __lockmgr_args+0xc2a > smb_co_lock() at smb_co_lock+0x38 > smb_co_gone() at smb_co_gone+0x38 > > smb_sm_lookup() at smb_sm_lookup+0xfe > smb_usr_lookup() at smb_usr_lookup+0xcd > nsmb_dev_ioctl() at nsmb_dev_ioctl+0x1f6 > giant_ioctl() at giant_ioctl+0x75 > devfs_ioctl_f() at devfs_ioctl_f+0x76 > kern_ioctl() at kern_ioctl+0x92 > ioctl() at ioctl+0xfd > syscall() at syscall+0x1bf > Xfast_syscall() at Xfast_syscall+0xab > --- syscall (54, FreeBSD ELF64, ioctl), rip = 0x800939aec, rsp = > > 0x7fffffffe048, rbp = 0x7fffffffe460 --- I've updated the patch in order to fix smb_co_lockstatus problem. Could you please stress test it while I investigate the LOR problem? Are you running with INVARIANTS? Thanks, Attilio -- Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. EinsteinReceived on Sun Nov 02 2008 - 16:53:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:36 UTC