Jonathan Hogg wrote: > On 2 Nov 2008, at 23:14, Alexandre Sunny Kovalenko wrote: > >> Just a "me too". I am using ZFS on my i386 (Core Duo) laptop: / >> and /boot are UFS2, /usr and /home are ZFS. Main appeal in my case was >> the startup time after the panic -- doing fsck on 120GB /home was not >> fun. I have to admit that machine has 3GB of real memory in it, though. > > I have everything except /boot on ZFS on an i386 machine with 2GB of > RAM. I've not had any problems. Being able to snapshot the whole system > before doing an installworld is a major plus in my view. Not to mention > the warm fuzzy feeling one gets from doing a full scrub of 1.5TB of > RAIDZ data and knowing it's all clean on disk. > > I'd be happier still if the more recent ZFS patch had made it into 7.1. > It'd be nice for it to make it into CURRENT at least. Is there any news > on that? If you are referring to the new ZFS version, then the answer is that pjd has been busy, but the last I heard Sun still needed to fix some bugs we discovered in testing. KrisReceived on Sat Nov 08 2008 - 21:15:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:37 UTC