On 17 Nov 2008, at 18:02, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 05:54:02PM +0000, Doug Rabson wrote: >> >> On 17 Nov 2008, at 17:10, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: >> >>> Hi. >>> >>> I'm seeing this panic very often now with few days old HEAD: >>> >>> >>> Any ideas? >> >> Can you reproduce this with INVARIANTS turned on? That should trigger >> a KASSERT a bit earlier and give me a chance to fix the thing. > > I've INVARIANTS on... Is there some assertion added recently you are > expecting? Hmm. I added an assert in r184921 which ought to have caught this. Could you try this patch and see if it changes anything: Index: rpc/clnt_dg.c =================================================================== --- rpc/clnt_dg.c (revision 184968) +++ rpc/clnt_dg.c (working copy) _at__at_ -543,7 +543,7 _at__at_ if (tv > 0) { if (cu->cu_closing || cu->cu_closed) - error = 0; + error = ESHUTDOWN; else error = msleep(cr, &cs->cs_lock, cu->cu_waitflag, cu->cu_waitchan, tv);Received on Mon Nov 17 2008 - 17:07:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:37 UTC