Re: NFS regression.

On 17 Nov 2008, at 18:37, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 06:07:52PM +0000, Doug Rabson wrote:
>>
>> On 17 Nov 2008, at 18:02, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 05:54:02PM +0000, Doug Rabson wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 17 Nov 2008, at 17:10, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm seeing this panic very often now with few days old HEAD:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>
>>>> Can you reproduce this with INVARIANTS turned on? That should  
>>>> trigger
>>>> a KASSERT a bit earlier and give me a chance to fix the thing.
>>>
>>> I've INVARIANTS on... Is there some assertion added recently you are
>>> expecting?
>>
>> Hmm. I added an assert in r184921 which ought to have caught this.
>> Could you try this patch and see if it changes anything:
>>
>> Index: rpc/clnt_dg.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- rpc/clnt_dg.c	(revision 184968)
>> +++ rpc/clnt_dg.c	(working copy)
>> _at__at_ -543,7 +543,7 _at__at_
>>
>> 		if (tv > 0) {
>> 			if (cu->cu_closing || cu->cu_closed)
>> -				error = 0;
>> +				error = ESHUTDOWN;
>> 			else
>> 				error = msleep(cr, &cs->cs_lock,
>> 				    cu->cu_waitflag, cu->cu_waitchan, tv);
>>
>
> Ok, my source is older and doesn't contain the assertion you added. I
> applied the patch above and also added assertion by hand (I'm not  
> setup
> now to upgrade entire system). This is the panic I get with the new
> kernel:
>
> ...
>
> If you want me to convert some of those to file:line, just let me  
> know.

Don't worry about line numbers - I can see where its calling from. Do  
you have a recipe for reproducing this? Also, could you try this patch  
instead of the previous:

Index: rpc/clnt_dg.c
===================================================================
--- rpc/clnt_dg.c	(revision 184968)
+++ rpc/clnt_dg.c	(working copy)
_at__at_ -515,6 +515,7 _at__at_
  			cu->cu_cwnd_wait = FALSE;
  			wakeup(&cu->cu_cwnd_wait);
  		}
+		KASSERT(cr->cr_mrep, ("NULL reply"));
  		goto got_reply;
  	}

_at__at_ -543,7 +544,7 _at__at_

  		if (tv > 0) {
  			if (cu->cu_closing || cu->cu_closed)
-				error = 0;
+				error = ESHUTDOWN;
  			else
  				error = msleep(cr, &cs->cs_lock,
  				    cu->cu_waitflag, cu->cu_waitchan, tv);
_at__at_ -611,6 +612,7 _at__at_
  				rt->rt_rtxcur = rt->rt_srtt + 4*rt->rt_deviate;
  			}

+			KASSERT(cr->cr_mrep, ("NULL reply"));
  			break;
  		}