Re: HEADS UP: New ZFS in the tree.

From: Thomas Sparrevohn <Thomas.Sparrevohn_at_btinternet.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:15:53 +0000
On Wednesday 19 November 2008 10:14:02 Ivan Voras wrote:
> Thomas Sparrevohn wrote:
> > On Tuesday 18 November 2008 21:56:38 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 09:50:51PM +0000, Thomas Sparrevohn wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday 18 November 2008 21:32:44 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> >>>> What's unexpected in that? As I noted it still needs more work, so
> >>>> chflags(2) working properly would be unexpected for me:)
> >>>>
> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> LOL - Unexpected that it just not returns operation not supported as it used to - I was a bit
> >>> trigger happy and upgraded my main pool - against the sound advice - leaves me in a bit of trouble ;-)
> >> Try 'make installworld NO_FSCHG='.
> >>
> > 
> > LOL and now I feel really stupid - thanks
> 
> Hmmm, I did an installworld from UFS to ZFS yesterday without special
> flags (actually, multiple installworlds for benchmarking), without
> errors. Files really did get schg (or equivalent) flag since I couldn't
> rm them afterwards. How is this possible? :)
> 
> 
> 

That is a surprise - as mine failed - totally - had to manually restore libc
Received on Wed Nov 19 2008 - 23:15:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:37 UTC