2008/11/20, John Baldwin <jhb_at_freebsd.org>: > So this patch is fairly minimal since udf(4) is currently read-only. The > changes include: > > * Set VV_ROOT in udf_vget() if we ever return a vnode instead of doing it only > in udf_root(). This matches the behavior of other operating systems and > correctly tags the root vnode with VV_ROOT in the unlikely case that we > create the vnode during a call to ufs_vget() that does not come from > ufs_root(). > * If the hash lookup in ufs_vget() fails, ensure an exclusive vnode lock is > used while creating the new vnode (same as UFS). > * Allow lock recursion (XXX: not really sure this is needed actually). > * Allow shared vnode locks on non-fifos. > * Honor the requested locking flags (shared vs exclusive) instead of always > using exclusive vnode locks during a lookup operation. > * Handle "." lookups the same way other filesystems do by just bumping the > reference on 'dvp' rather than calling udf_vget(). > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/udf_mpsafe.patch _at__at_ -589,6 +582,22 _at__at_ if (error || *vpp != NULL) return (error); + /* + * We must promote to an exclusive lock for vnode creation. This + * can happen if lookup is passed LOCKSHARED. + */ + if ((flags & LK_TYPE_MASK) == LK_SHARED) { + flags &= ~LK_TYPE_MASK; + flags |= LK_EXCLUSIVE; + } + On -CURRENT, operations are bitwise (differently from 7.x and such). What you want to do is just: flag = (flag & ~LK_SHARED) | LK_EXCLUSIVE; The other parts look good (except that IIRC stlye wants all multi-line comments to be preceeded by a white, empty line). Thanks, Attilio -- Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. EinsteinReceived on Thu Nov 20 2008 - 21:02:31 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:37 UTC