On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 12:57 AM, O. Hartmann <ohartman_at_zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > Alexander Kabaev wrote: >> >> On Fri, 18 May 2007 19:20:07 -0400 >> Alexander Kabaev <kabaev_at_gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> HEADS UP: I will start importing GCC 4.2.0 bits in about one hour and >>> plan to finish in a couple of hours after that. >>> >>> The src/ tree will be utterly broken meanwhile. I'll send an 'all >>> clear' message when done. >> >> Done. >> > > Just for those who aren't on the cutting edge: why gcc 4.2.0 and not 4.2.1 > as it is used in 7.X? > > Regards, > O. Sorry about that. I accidently revived a bunch of stuck email messages from our mailing list processing system. These messages from 2007 came back to life somehow. (Hint: Mailman's 'unshunt' command doesn't give a usage message) -- Peter Wemm - peter_at_wemm.org; peter_at_FreeBSD.org; peter_at_yahoo-inc.com; KI6FJV "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 "If Java had true garbage collection, most programs would delete themselves upon execution." -- Robert SewellReceived on Wed Oct 08 2008 - 06:36:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:36 UTC