On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:13:39 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh_at_gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 01:40:57AM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 14:47:56 +0900 > > Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh_at_gmail.com> wrote: > > > Attached file is fix for AX88178 USB Gigabit controller. The patch > > > removed old hack to find the correct PHY address of controller and > > > it will affect all axe(4) controllers. If you have axe(4) hardware > > > please give it try and let me know how it goes. > > Oops, why vsc8211 is vitesse's instead of cicada's? :-) > Because Vitesse now owns Cicada and Vitesse site clearly indicates > the model name is VSC8211 single port 10/100/1000 PHY. Yes, but phy's vendor is reported as cicada. ciphy0 pnpinfo oui=0x3f1 model=0xb rev=0x1 at phyno=24 ###### from sys/dev/mii/miidevs - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - oui CICADA 0x0003F1 Cicada Semiconductor oui VITESSE 0x0001c1 Vitesse Semiconductor - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - So vsc8211 should be set CICADA on src, but indicated VITESSE on message. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - miibus0: <MII bus> on axe0 ciphy0: <Vitesse VSC8211 10/100/1000TX PHY> PHY 24 on miibus0 ciphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Norikatsu Shigemura <nork_at_FreeBSD.org>Received on Mon Oct 20 2008 - 04:49:36 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:36 UTC