On Thu, 23.10.2008 at 14:16:44 +0800, David Adam wrote: > I did try a loader from the CURRENT sources, which produced the same > output. > > However, the plot thickens. When I don't specify the kernel name with > nextboot(8), but instead interrupt the loader and use 'unload; load > /boot/kernel/gd-8; load /boot/kernel/gd-8/geom_mirror.ko' and so on for my > other modules, the kernel boots quite happily - both using the 7.0 loader > and the new one from the CURRENT sources. > > Are there likely to be big differences in the boot process between using > nextboot(8) and the unload/load method? I've used nextboot(8) to > successfully load other kernels on this machine before. > > In any case, now that I have a successful workaround I can try the patches > I was after in the first place. If there's any more information I can > provide, or you'd like access to this system (it has serial console and > remote power control), let me know. Wild guess: I think acpi is no longer built as module on recent -CURRENT but included in the kernel. Perhaps the unload dance you did above "fixed" the double loading of the module? Could you check if your nextboot kernel is containing/missing ACPI directly? Cheers, Ulrich Spoerlein PS: I'm not saying ACPI code is at fault, but rather loader code that loads the modules -- It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak, and remove all doubt.Received on Thu Oct 23 2008 - 16:57:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:36 UTC