Re: Multiple routing table support commited

From: Julian Elischer <julian_at_elischer.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 09:57:57 -0700
NAKAJI Hiroyuki wrote:
> Thanks for your great work.
> 
> Do you have a plan to MFC this feature to RELENG_6?
> Or is it better to upgrade my RELENG6 box to RELENG_7?
> 
> My ISP allows 5 PPPoE sessions but it always returns only one IP address
> as HISADDR. I hope this FIB feature will help my multi PPPoE sessions.
> 
> I tried "setfib -1 ppp anothersession" on my RELENG_7 box, which
> complains
> 
> Warning: iface add: ioctl(SIOCAIFADDR, 10.172.1.73 -> 210.247.16.1): File exists
> 
> Maybe I misunderstand the usage.
> 
>>>>>> In <4824F1B4.6010302_at_elischer.org> 
>>>>>> 	Julian Elischer <julian_at_elischer.org> wrote:
>> I have committed the base of teh Multi-routing-table support.
>> I am current;y waiting for it to loop back to me before a final
>> make universe test, but I think it should be ok.
>> if you do nothing you should not see any difference.


I have a perforce branch with a RELENG_6 version but it will not be 
checked in. WE use it at work on 6 but we will go to 7 soon
so we will not need to have it committed. we currently just add the
patch when we do the build.
Received on Tue Sep 02 2008 - 14:57:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:34 UTC