Re: drm causes kernel panic

On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 11:52 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 01:53:05PM -0400, Robert Noland wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 10:02 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > 
> > > Your patch fixes the problem.  With a new kernel and Xorg's dri
> > > module loaded, I now see in /var/log/Xorg.0.log
> > > 
> > > (II) MACH64(0): [drm] SAREA 2200+1208: 3408
> > > drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
> > > drmOpenDevice: open result is 9, (OK)
> > > drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
> > > drmOpenDevice: open result is 9, (OK)
> > > drmOpenByBusid: Searching for BusID pci:0000:03:06.0
> > > drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
> > > drmOpenDevice: open result is 9, (OK)
> > > drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns 9
> > > drmOpenByBusid: drmGetBusid reports pci:0000:03:06.0
> > > (II) [drm] DRM interface version 1.2
> > > (II) [drm] DRM open master succeeded.
> > > (II) MACH64(0): [drm] Using the DRM lock SAREA also for drawables.
> > > (II) MACH64(0): [drm] framebuffer handle = 0xfd000000
> > > (II) MACH64(0): [drm] added 1 reserved context for kernel
> > > (II) MACH64(0): X context handle = 0x1
> > > (II) MACH64(0): [drm] installed DRM signal handler
> > > (II) MACH64(0): [drm] Will request asynchronous DMA mode
> > > (==) MACH64(0): [drm] Using 2 MB for DMA buffers
> > > (II) MACH64(0): [pci] ring handle = 0x64a34000
> > > (II) MACH64(0): [pci] Ring mapped at 0x2006d4000
> > > (II) MACH64(0): [drm] register handle = 0xfeaff000
> > > (II) MACH64(0): [dri] Visual configs initialized
> > > (II) MACH64(0): [dri] Block 0 base at 0xfeaff400
> > > (WW) MACH64(0): Not enough memory for local textures, disabling DRI
> > > (II) MACH64(0): [drm] removed 1 reserved context for kernel
> > > (II) MACH64(0): [drm] unmapping 8192 bytes of SAREA 0xfffffffe40962000 at 0x2006d2000
> > > (II) MACH64(0): [drm] Closed DRM master.
> > 
> > I'm guessing that this is a pci based card like mine?  So, I assume this
> > is the same case as before the updates?
> > 
> 
> Yes, it is pci based.  It's actually an integrate ATI Rage XL on
> the Tyan motherboard.  I updated my Xorg installation, so the
> previous behavior isn't relevant.  Prior to the Xorg update, 
> Xorg's dri module refused to load because the drm version is
> 1.2, which was previously unsupported.

Ok, I have one system like that.  So this seems good on mach64 and
intel...  Now, if I can just get a report on radeon...

robert.

>