Re: Interface auto-cloning bug or feature?

From: Ed Schouten <ed_at_80386.nl>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 12:18:56 +0200

* Ed Schouten <ed_at_80386.nl> wrote:
> We should eventually eliminate the dev_stdclone()/clone_create()
                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^
> interface.

Correct myself: there's nothing wrong with dev_stdclone - it can be used
independently from the clone lists.

-- 
 Ed Schouten <ed_at_80386.nl>
 WWW: http://80386.nl/

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

Received on Fri Sep 19 2008 - 08:18:57 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Richard Grint: "Re: amd opteron NUMA support"
Previous message: Ed Schouten: "Re: Interface auto-cloning bug or feature?"
In reply to: Ed Schouten: "Re: Interface auto-cloning bug or feature?"
Next in thread: Maksim Yevmenkin: "Re: Interface auto-cloning bug or feature?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:35 UTC