Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 03:46:45PM -0400, William LeFebvre wrote: > > Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 02:24:09PM +0200, Nikola Le??i?? wrote: > > > > Is it normal to have 100.64% for cc1? > > > > > > I would assume so, as your machine has more than one logical or > > > physical processor. > > > > > > > No, that was a per-thread display he posted. Altho undesirable I can > > come up with some plausible reasons why it is exceeding 100%, all > > related to the uncertainty of trying to perform accurate measurements on > > a moving target. I suppose I could cap the percentage at 100 just for > > aesthetic reasons, and to keep it from overflowing the column. > > Ah ha. That could also explain why gstat(8) has the same problem > (%busy column occasionally being >100, sometimes 102-103%). A simple & > 100 on the displayed value should suffice, yep. I think the reason why gstat(8) occasionally displays values > 100% is that it doesn't know which value exactly *is* 100%. The %busy column should probably be regarded as a relative measurement and not be taken to provide a precise number. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd "One of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was that, lacking zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C programs." -- Robert FirthReceived on Mon Sep 29 2008 - 05:23:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:35 UTC