On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 16:18, Bernd Walter <ticso_at_cicely7.cicely.de> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 02:50:24PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: >> Hi, >> >> to fs_at_, please CC me, as I'm not subscribed. >> >> I monitored (by hand) a while the sysctls kstat.zfs.misc.arcstats.size >> and kstat.zfs.misc.arcstats.hdr_size. Both grow way higher (at some >> point I've seen more than 500M) than what I have configured in >> vfs.zfs.arc_max (40M). > > My understanding about this is the following: > vfs.zfs.arc_min/max are not used as min max values. > They are used as high/low watermarks. > If arc is more than max the arc a thread is triggered to reduce the > arc cache until min, but in the meantime other threads can still grow > arc so there is a race between them. Hmm, if this is true the ARC size should go down to arc_min once it did grow past arc_max and no new data is coming along but I do not observe such a thing here. It simply stays near but below arc_max here all the time. I have only /home on ZFS with moderate load. > >> After a while FS operations (e.g. pkgdb -F with about 900 packages... >> my specific workload is the fixup of gnome packages after the removal >> of the obsolete libusb port) get very slow (in my specific example I >> let the pkgdb run several times over night and it still is not >> finished). > > I've seen many workloads were prefetching can saturate disks without > ever being used. > You might want to try disabling prefetch. > Of course prefetching also grows arc. > >> The big problem with this is, that at some point in time the machine >> reboots (panic, page fault, page not present, during a fork1). I have >> the impression (beware, I have a watchdog configured, as I don't know >> if a triggered WD would cause the same panic, the following is just a >> guess) that I run out of memory of some kind (I have 1G RAM, i386, max >> kmem size 700M). I restarted pkgdb several times after a reboot, and >> it continues to process the libusb removal, but hey, this is anoying. > > With just 700M kmem you should set arc values extremly small and > avoid anything which can quickly grow it. > Unfortunately accessing many small files is a know arc filling workload. > Activating vfs.zfs.cache_flush_disable can help speeding up arc decreasing, > with the obvous risks of course... > >> Does someone see something similar to what I describe (mainly the >> growth of the arc cache way beyond what is configured)? Anyone with >> some ideas what to try? > > In my opinion the watermark mechanism can work as it is, but there should > be a forced max - currently there is no garantied limit at all. > Nevertheless it is up for the people which know the code to decide. > > -- > B.Walter <bernd_at_bwct.de> http://www.bwct.de > Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" >Received on Fri Apr 17 2009 - 14:58:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:46 UTC