2009/4/27 Luigi Rizzo <rizzo_at_iet.unipi.it>: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 04:51:18PM +0300, Maxim Ignatenko wrote: >> 2009/4/27 Luigi Rizzo <rizzo_at_iet.unipi.it>: >> > >> > ok there seems to be no change related to dummynet between these >> > two versions so I am not sure where to look. >> > Could you double check what is the last working version ? >> > >> Yes, r191201 have this problems too (it seems, i didn't updated for a >> long time). >> Now I updated to r190864 (just before last change on ip_dummynet.c) - >> all works fine. Should I now check r190865? > > yes it would be great if you could identify a specific change that > caused the problem. > There is one thing particularly tricky in one of the dummynet > changes, because some fields changed between 32/64 bits and > signed/unsigned. I may have unadvertently introduced some > conversion bug. > On r190865 problem appeared again. > thanks a lot for the feedback > You welcome :) Thanks.Received on Mon Apr 27 2009 - 12:44:24 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:46 UTC