On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Ben Kelly <ben_at_wanderview.com> wrote: > On Apr 30, 2009, at 3:19 AM, Kip Macy wrote: >> >> I have a system at work that I could lock up within minutes with >> fsstress. With this patch the system is now stable with large numbers >> of fsstress processes running. >> >> Provided I get the heads up from pjd, I will commit it. > > I found on my system that I could not zfs export my pool after running my > load test with this patch. To try to fix this I've updated the patch to > delegate to vrele(9) instead of directly decrementing the vnode count. I > also modified the deferred operation to restart a full vrele(9) instead of > calling VOP_INACTIVE since it occurred to me someone else might have grabbed > the vnode while our task was on the queue. I have only had time to run a > short test, but it seems to avoid the problem so far. > > Can you retest with these changes? >\ I'll try deferring the entire vrele. -KipReceived on Thu Apr 30 2009 - 15:13:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:46 UTC