2009/8/1 Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky_at_c2i.net>: > On Saturday 01 August 2009 04:17:42 Giovanni Trematerra wrote: >> > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Hans Petter Selasky<hselasky_at_c2i.net> >> > wrote: >> > >> > >> > I'm not saying that your approach will not work or that it is wrong. I'm >> > saying that it is not fast enough. Your patch affects the boottime, in a >> > negative way. >> >> I tested a patch for a while. I didn't notice any slow down in boot time. >> Well, I haven't measured it but I can't see any noticeable difference >> even booting from an USB key. > > Hi, > > We are talking about some seconds. Store the "ticks" varible in "usb_attach()" > in sys/dev/usb/controller/usb_controller.c and print out the difference every > time "usb_bus_explore()" is called having "if (bus->bus_roothold != NULL)". So, thanks to the precious help of Peter Holm I worked on this patch fixing 3 problems reported by Peter and addressing the Hans' concern: now newbus lock is not held for the whole duration of explore handler, but just acquired and released when needed (really modifying the newbus subtree). I think it can also be faster than the Giant version now. New patch is here: http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/Yahoo/newbus/newbus_locking4.diff Please let me know if you can note any regressions. Thanks, Attilio -- Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. EinsteinReceived on Sat Aug 01 2009 - 16:34:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:53 UTC