On Aug 5, 2009, at 11:38, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 09:20:58AM +0200, Thomas Backman wrote: >> Oh! I noticed that I actually finised my test case for this panic; I >> thought I stopped midway, but that was something else. >> Here are all the details: >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2009-July/006585.html >> (If you have the libzfs_sendrecv patch, your own vnops patch and >> DDEBUG=1, there's no need to patch anything at all.) > > I belive it is safe to do the following: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_vfsops.c.2.patch > > Could you give it a try? OK, I was wrong, I could give it a try now. :) It seems to work! -DDEBUG=1 and no panic. Just to be sure I tried to revert the patch, and sure enough, solaris assert panic at that line. The backup script (aka. real world test) also did not panic, which it did before. Regards, ThomasReceived on Wed Aug 05 2009 - 10:07:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:53 UTC