Hey everybody, I discovered a reproducible network-triggerable panic on my -CURRENT box (r196074). The NIC is a nfe (nForce4 SLI) in case it matters. The backtrace differs slightly (the first one had less ??'s, but I'm not sure I ran the same scan that time). I ran the following on a Linux box, while trialling zenmap ("Slow comprehensive scan" - and needless to say .1.10 is the FreeBSD box): nmap -sS -sU -T4 -A -v -PE -PP -PS21,22,23,25,80,113,31339 - PA80,113,443,10042 -PO --script all 192.168.1.10 (nmap -sU -A -v 192.168.1.10 also triggers a panic within 3 seconds, at most.) Starting Nmap 5.00 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2009-08-09 17:52 CEST NSE: Loaded 59 scripts for scanning. Initiating ARP Ping Scan at 17:52 Scanning 192.168.1.10 [1 port] Completed ARP Ping Scan at 17:52, 0.01s elapsed (1 total hosts) Initiating SYN Stealth Scan at 17:52 Scanning chaos (192.168.1.10) [1000 ports] Discovered open port .../tcp on 192.168.10 Discovered open port 80/tcp on 192.168.1.10 Discovered open port .../tcp on 192.168.10 ... and a few more Completed SYN Stealth Scan at 17:52, 5.04s elapsed (1000 total ports) Initiating UDP Scan at 17:52 [... the FreeBSD target box panicked here here, within a second or two] ----------------------------------------------------------------- On the console: Limiting closed port RST response from 276 to 200 packets/sec Limiting closed port RST response from 239 to 200 packets/sec Limiting closed port RST response from 280 to 200 packets/sec Limiting closed port RST response from 319 to 200 packets/sec Limiting icmp unreach response from 214 to 200 packets/sec Limiting icmp unreach response from 275 to 200 packets/sec Limiting icmp unreach response from 449 to 200 packets/sec core.txt: Unread portion of the kernel message buffer: Limiting icmp unreach response from 449 to 200 packets/sec Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 fault virtual address = 0x18 fault code = supervisor read data, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0xffffffff805d2722 stack pointer = 0x28:0xffffff803e76f980 frame pointer = 0x28:0xffffff803e76f990 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 846 (nfsd: service) [NOTE: nfsd was not in use, merely running] panic: from debugger cpuid = 0 KDB: stack backtrace: Uptime: 8m48s Physical memory: 2029 MB Dumping 1625 MB: ... #11 0xffffffff805dba87 in calltrap () at /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/ exception.S:224 #12 0xffffffff805d2722 in xdrmbuf_inline (xdrs=0xffffff803e76fa30, len=4) at /usr/src/sys/xdr/xdr_mbuf.c:302 #13 0xffffffff805d2b90 in xdrmbuf_getlong (xdrs=0xffffff803e76fa30, lp=0xffffff803e76f9e0) at /usr/src/sys/xdr/xdr_mbuf.c:147 #14 0xffffffff805d1a4d in xdr_int (xdrs=Variable "xdrs" is not available. ) at /usr/src/sys/xdr/xdr.c:111 #15 0xffffffff80554ef4 in xdr_callmsg (xdrs=0xffffff803e76fa30, cmsg=0xffffff803e76fb70) at /usr/src/sys/rpc/rpc_callmsg.c:188 #16 0xffffffff80559c60 in svc_dg_recv (xprt=Variable "xprt" is not available. ) at /usr/src/sys/rpc/svc_dg.c:216 #17 0xffffffff80557910 in svc_run_internal (pool=0xffffff00027acc00, ismaster=0) at /usr/src/sys/rpc/svc.c:797 #18 0xffffffff8055811b in svc_thread_start (arg=Variable "arg" is not available. ) at /usr/src/sys/rpc/svc.c:1198 #19 0xffffffff80341008 in fork_exit ( callout=0xffffffff80558110 <svc_thread_start>, arg=0xffffff00027acc00, frame=0xffffff803e76fc80) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_fork.c:838 #20 0xffffffff805dbf5e in fork_trampoline () at /usr/src/sys/amd64/ amd64/exception.S:561 #21 0x0000000000000010 in ?? () #22 0x00007fffffffe710 in ?? () ... #47 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #48 0xffffffff808acf00 in affinity () #49 0xffffff0002d9d390 in ?? () #50 0xffffff803e76f200 in ?? () #51 0xffffff803e76f1b8 in ?? () #52 0xffffff0002336720 in ?? () #53 0xffffffff80391c2d in sched_switch (td=0xffffffff80558110, newtd=0xffffff00027acc00, flags=Variable "flags" is not available. ) at /usr/src/sys/kern/sched_ule.c:1858 ----------------------------------------- I'll be honest and say that FreeBSD doesn't feel very stable for me... Yeah, sure, I use experimental features which causes many of my panics (like ZFS) and run -CURRENT, but will really all issues like this one be fixed in time for 8.0-RELEASE? It's pretty ugly that I can panic it via the network every try, in literally 2-3 seconds. Regards, ThomasReceived on Sun Aug 09 2009 - 14:15:31 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:53 UTC