>> >> The problems are similar to >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2009-August/010287.html >> > > That was a configuration issue. > >> >> When I try to ping the address the machine panics! >> (something with sin_family and in_lltable_lookup) >> http://denisy.dyndns.org/panic.jpg >> > > After a quick cursory read over the code, this issue appears to be a > problem > in the flow-table handling logic in ip_output() function. > > Two problems seem to exist in the flow-table logic. > > 1. In flowtable_lookup() where it searches for the destination in the > routing table, the code does not check for the rt_ifp type once a > route entry is found. In the case of "if_tun", the flow-table > must not try to cache any entry whose "rt_ifp->if_flag & > IFF_POINTOPOINT" > is true. Right now it does, and I think this will trigger the crash > later. > > 2. The flowtable_lookup() seems to alway assume a valid entry > will be returned as long as a route entry exists for the > destination. In other words, if a route exists for the destination, > then either flow-table already have a cache, or a new entry > is created. This does not work due to (1.) above. > flowtable_lookup() should allow a "bypass flow-table" return, not > just success/failure result. This is especially true for > tunneling interfaces "if_tun, if_gre" etc. where ip_output() > will be called multiple times (nested). Only at the final invocation > of ip_output() (where the rt->rt_ifp points to a physical NIC) > should a flow-table entry be created. > > So for now, as a possible temporary workaround, disable FLOWTABLE in your > kernel configuration file and see if that fixes the problem. > > -- Qing Qing, yes, disabling the flowtable (sysctl net.inet.flowtable.enable=0) fix the problem (no more IPv4 is not on the network). But here, everything is working fine, even with that annoying message (no crashes). Thanks, LuizReceived on Wed Aug 19 2009 - 15:04:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:54 UTC