James R. Van Artsdalen wrote: > This code seems to be suspect > sys/amd64/amd64/machdep.c: > > for (i = 0; i <= physmap_idx; i += 2) { > if (smap->base < physmap[i + 1]) { > if (boothowto & RB_VERBOSE) > printf( > "Overlapping or non-monotonic memory region, ignoring second > region\n"); > continue; > } > } > The first-order problem is a typo: that "continue" isn't doing anything. Fixing it (to make physmap non-descending) improves things. Code elsewhere apparently assumes that the upper bound in the last physmap entry is the maximum of all physmap upper bounds. But there is still the incorrect assumption that smap is non-descending. Perhaps just sort() smap on the base address?Received on Tue Aug 25 2009 - 02:53:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:54 UTC