Alexander Motin wrote: > ### load mav_at_ > linear 1MB read random > 1 process MBps: 104 tps: 159 > 2 processes MBps: 214 tps: 256 > 4 processes MBps: 425 tps: 332 > 5 processes MBps: 300 tps: 352 > 8 processes MBps: 245 tps: 391 > 16 processes MBps: 255 tps: 436 > 32 processes MBps: 263 tps: 457 > > Random is close to round-robin. Request balancing is close to perfect. > Linear shows maximum possible performance for number of processes up to > the number of drives, using only as much disks as needed. With more > processes then disks, performance predictably reducing, but still beats > all other methods. > > I think it is hardly possible to get much more. > Awesome, please commit - this issue has been dragging for too long already. Pawel seems either busy or have lost interest in maintaining this, so you don't really need to wait for his approval. -MaximReceived on Thu Dec 03 2009 - 19:17:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:58 UTC