Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: >> Are you sure that OpenBSD has a better record? > > > I found this for loose reference. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenBSD#Security_and_code_auditing > > I will say that even though on the surface OpenBSD appears to have a > better track record security wise > I tend to use FreeBSD for my desktop needs because of things like > Nvidia Graphics (esp now that there is amd64 support) Where's that? The Nvidia site says nothing about it yet, and the makefile for x11/nvidia-driver still says ONLY_FOR_ARCHS=i386. I'm eagerly waiting for it, but I can't find anything other than a forum post (I don't have the address handy at this computer, but I know it's somewhere in the mailing list archive) from Zander at Nvidia corporation saying it's on its way. > also wine works in FreeBSD and some of my clinets still run windows apps. > > I find FreeBSD is the middle ground the world needs between Linix and OpenBSD > > Sam Fourman Jr. > Fourman Networks > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" > > >Received on Sat Dec 12 2009 - 23:43:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:59 UTC