Doug Barton <dougb_at_FreeBSD.org> writes: > Wojciech A. Koszek wrote: > > It looks fine for the first glance. I would also reconsider putting it in > > DEFAULTS, as des_at_ pointed out. > Ok, no objections on my part. I thought putting it in the file itself > would make it easier for those who wanted to remove it, but I'm also > in agreement with those that believe that there is no real need to > remove it except for extreme cases, and they (generally) already know > what they are doing. :) One could argue that making it hard to disable is a feature... Anyway, adding nooption INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE to your kernel config will disable it without having to mess with DEFAULTS. I wish we had a global DEFAULTS, though, so you didn't have to add INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE to N different files. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des_at_des.noReceived on Wed Dec 16 2009 - 14:33:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:59 UTC