Re: May be include in GENERIC option INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE?

From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des_at_des.no>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:33:03 +0100
Doug Barton <dougb_at_FreeBSD.org> writes:
> Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:
> > It looks fine for the first glance. I would also reconsider putting it in
> > DEFAULTS, as des_at_ pointed out.
> Ok, no objections on my part. I thought putting it in the file itself
> would make it easier for those who wanted to remove it, but I'm also
> in agreement with those that believe that there is no real need to
> remove it except for extreme cases, and they (generally) already know
> what they are doing. :)

One could argue that making it hard to disable is a feature...  Anyway,
adding

nooption INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE

to your kernel config will disable it without having to mess with
DEFAULTS.

I wish we had a global DEFAULTS, though, so you didn't have to add
INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE to N different files.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des_at_des.no
Received on Wed Dec 16 2009 - 14:33:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:59 UTC