I think John is referring to my first reply to Anton, early in the thread, in which I said that I thought it would be easier for Anton to get help for problems with -CURRENT by using svn revision numbers, because most base system developers were using that VCS. Apparently, John at least is not using svn exclusively, and is willing to look up cvs revision numbers. b. On 12/28/09, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des_at_des.no> wrote: > John Baldwin <jhb_at_freebsd.org> writes: >> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des_at_des.no> writes: >> > This discussion is pointless if your source tree is not a Subversion >> > working copy. >> That's not true. I still use cvsweb quite often as one can more easily >> see >> what has been MFC'd that way rather than with the svn equivalent. And it >> is >> easy to use cvsweb to find a particular CVS revision and map it to an SVN >> revision. > > The discussion was about using Subversion to woll back commits in what > was in all probability either a cvsup checkout or a CVS working copy. > > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des_at_des.no >Received on Mon Dec 28 2009 - 16:38:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:59 UTC