Re: Alternatives to gcc

From: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7_at_cox.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 10:48:42 -0600
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 00:05:49 -0600, David O'Brien <obrien_at_freebsd.org>
wrote:

> "Pedro F. Giffuni" <giffunip_at_tutopia.com> writes:
>> - Replacing groff with something less restricted that doesn't require
>> C++: Heirloom-doctools may be an option.
>
> You're proposing replacing GPLv2 stuff with CDDL'ed stuff?
>
>     $ cd heirloom-doctools-080407> grep -l -R CDDL * | wc -l
>          217
>
> The last time I asked $WORK's lawyers, GPLv2 was acceptable to
> *carefully* ship with our product.  CDDL was forbidden (as is GPLv3).

Interesting... I thought, CDDL is more flexible than GPLv2? Or do I  
misunderstand something with CDDL?

Cheers,
Mezz


-- 
mezz7_at_cox.net  -  mezz_at_FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/  -  gnome_at_FreeBSD.org
Received on Sun Feb 01 2009 - 16:21:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:41 UTC