(sorry that my mailer gives so much trouble) --- On Mon, 2/2/09, Chet Ramey <chet.ramey_at_case.edu> wrote: > > It all depends on what features people choose to use in GNU's > > readline that makes it compatible or not with libedit. > > ...which means that it's not a drop-in readline replacement. And > here we are -- back where we started. We don't need a drop in replacement, we need a replacement that works well enough for the base system. Like in the other BSDs the ports/packaging system can continue carrying GNU readline. Why go into all this trouble? GNU readline is part of an evil plot: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html Pedro.Received on Mon Feb 02 2009 - 16:47:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:41 UTC