Andrew Reilly wrote: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 01:27:58AM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: >> The FreeBSD GNOME Team maintains a user-level hal FAQ at >> http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/halfaq.html . We don't have any > > I've found that one, and must read it again, as reading it did > not result in me being able to mount a CD-ROM (I have submitted > a PR with the copious output requested on that page). The > caveat about GEOM labels with spaces: does that apply to CD-ROM > images with a space in the label name? That appears to have > been squashed out at the GEOM Label stage, but it's not > something that I can do anything about: the CD-ROM is what it > is. If the output of sysctl -b kern.geom.conftxt produces names with spaces, then hal will not be able to mount the volume. > >> FreeBSD-specific development docs. However, the hal spec at >> http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/hal-spec/hal-spec.html is a good >> starting point. > > That looks like exactly what I was looking for, thanks! I'll > give it a good read. > >>> Also, is there a FreeBSD hald-meister, whos job it is to ensure that hal >>> continues to reflect up-to-date FreeBSD capabilities and mechanisms? >> That's me. I'd really appreciate help as I don't have all of the >> requisite hardware or expertise in all of the subsystems. For instance, >> we're completely lacking SD/MMC, firewire, and printer functionality. > > I've got a firewire external drive and a firewire cardbus > reader, which could be useful for testing? The drive seems to > work fine from /etc/fstab. Haven't tried to get hal to use it, > yet. Haven't tried the cardbus reader (mostly use that on my > MacBook.) Unless people are willing to ship me hardware, I will have to rely on them for developing the underlying support code in hal. > >> Some of this has been posted on FreeBSD's idea page for some time. > > I'll have a look, thanks. > >>From an overall philosiphical perspective, is hal something that > we're going to be able to get comfortable with, as Unix admins? > Is it a piece of infrastructure that has just been missing from > traditional Unix, or does the move for Xorg and Gnome to require > it mean that those projects are "doing it wrong"? If the > former, do you see a time when we'll want a pure-BSD version > that just ships as a standard part of the base system, or will > it always be a port? Hal (of the upcoming DeviceKit) will always be a port. Joe > > Cheers, > > Andrew. > -- Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: gnome_at_FreeBSD.org FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnomeReceived on Mon Feb 16 2009 - 17:08:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:42 UTC