Re: boot0cfg -s vs. GEOM_PART_*?

From: Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt_at_mac.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:23:26 -0800
On Feb 17, 2009, at 12:00 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

> In message <D1292F9E-BF53-443F-9E63-92D527A41A3B_at_mac.com>, Marcel  
> Moolenaar wri
> tes:
>
>> 1.  We need to expose the current bootcode through
>>    kern.geom.confxml
>
> No.
>
> No.
>
> NO.
>
> We do not want arbitrary large binary blobs in the confxml
> output.

I'm not going to start a discussion on arbitrariness
and largeness of bootcode. Instead, let me just ask:

Do you have alternatives?

-- 
Marcel Moolenaar
xcllnt_at_mac.com
Received on Tue Feb 17 2009 - 19:23:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:42 UTC