Re: boot0cfg -s vs. GEOM_PART_*?

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk_at_phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:37:33 +0000
In message <D29A6039-5105-49CB-B613-DD561CDD1A89_at_mac.com>, Marcel Moolenaar wri
tes:

>For boot0cfg this is probably acceptable, because
>it only operates on MBRs. But as a generic solution
>this won't work.

Then pick up the bootcode via ioctls, it does not belong
in the confxml sysctl.

Poul-Henning
-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tue Feb 17 2009 - 20:37:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:42 UTC