In message <B0DD65C3-4792-47C4-9BBE-E33BD58EA537_at_mac.com>, Marcel Moolenaar wri tes: >I'll consider this. > > From my perspective: > >o The fact that we have a separate OAM interface that > doesn't use file descriptors (at the application > level), having to use ioctl(2) all of a sudden is... > well... odd. Likewise for regular read/write. Just > for boot code do we need o worry about mapping GEOM > names to device special files. You can use g_ctl instead of ioctl if you want, it just does not belong in the xml. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.Received on Wed Feb 18 2009 - 07:13:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:42 UTC