Re: bootblocks compile broken?

From: John Baldwin <jhb_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:54:56 -0500
On Monday 23 February 2009 11:55:27 pm Julian Elischer wrote:
> # cd /sys/boot/i386
> # make
> 
> [...]
> 
> cc -O2 -pipe  -DLOADER_NFS_SUPPORT -DCOMPORT=0x3f8 -DCOMSPEED=9600
> -DSMBIOS_SERIAL_NUMBERS -DTERM_EMU -Dalloca=__builtin_alloca
> -I/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/../../common
> -I/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/../btx/lib
> -I/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/../../../contrib/dev/acpica
> -I/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/../../..
> -I.
> -I/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/../../../../lib/libstand/
> -ffreestanding -mpref
> -mno-sse -mno-sse2
> -mno-sse3
> -c /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/bootinfo64.c
> 
> /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/bootinfo64.c: In function 'bi_checkcpu':
> /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/bootinfo64.c:155: error: 
> 'CENTAUR_VENDOR_ID' undeclared (first use in this function)
> /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/bootinfo64.c:155: error: (Each 
> undeclared identifier is reported only once
> /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/bootinfo64.c:155: error: for each 
> function it appears in.)
> *** Error code 1
> 
> Stop in /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386.
> *** Error code 1
> 
> this is defined in specialreg.h
> but in "machine/specialreg.h"
> there is no 'machine' as such
> 
> I suspect that someone expected to only compile bootblocks as part of 
> a system build?
> 
> not sure what the "correct" fix is..

I think you have a stale tree.  What branch are you building and which arch?

-- 
John Baldwin
Received on Tue Feb 24 2009 - 16:56:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:42 UTC