Re: bootblocks compile broken?

From: Julian Elischer <julian_at_elischer.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:09:59 -0800
John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday 23 February 2009 11:55:27 pm Julian Elischer wrote:
>> # cd /sys/boot/i386
>> # make
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> cc -O2 -pipe  -DLOADER_NFS_SUPPORT -DCOMPORT=0x3f8 -DCOMSPEED=9600
>> -DSMBIOS_SERIAL_NUMBERS -DTERM_EMU -Dalloca=__builtin_alloca
>> -I/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/../../common
>> -I/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/../btx/lib
>> -I/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/../../../contrib/dev/acpica
>> -I/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/../../..
>> -I.
>> -I/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/../../../../lib/libstand/
>> -ffreestanding -mpref
>> -mno-sse -mno-sse2
>> -mno-sse3
>> -c /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/bootinfo64.c
>>
>> /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/bootinfo64.c: In function 'bi_checkcpu':
>> /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/bootinfo64.c:155: error: 
>> 'CENTAUR_VENDOR_ID' undeclared (first use in this function)
>> /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/bootinfo64.c:155: error: (Each 
>> undeclared identifier is reported only once
>> /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/bootinfo64.c:155: error: for each 
>> function it appears in.)
>> *** Error code 1
>>
>> Stop in /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386.
>> *** Error code 1
>>
>> this is defined in specialreg.h
>> but in "machine/specialreg.h"
>> there is no 'machine' as such
>>
>> I suspect that someone expected to only compile bootblocks as part of 
>> a system build?
>>
>> not sure what the "correct" fix is..
> 
> I think you have a stale tree.  What branch are you building and which arch?
> 

-current

and I deleted /sys/boot and re-checked it out and got the same result.
Received on Thu Feb 26 2009 - 00:10:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:42 UTC