Re: gjournal is not automounted any more

In message: <8F22F980-0D4C-4074-8685-3FFAD4558362_at_mac.com>
            Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt_at_mac.com> writes:
: 
: On Jan 3, 2009, at 9:42 AM, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: 
: > In message: <440945C2-252E-489A-902E-A499753A5EF8_at_mac.com>
: >            Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt_at_mac.com> writes:
: > :
: > : On Jan 2, 2009, at 10:14 PM, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > :
: > : > In message: <20090103033543.GB77475_at_dragon.NUXI.org>
: > : >            "David O'Brien" <obrien_at_freebsd.org> writes:
: > : > : On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 11:47:57AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > : > : > In message: <20090102091334.GA41230_at_dragon.NUXI.org>
: > : > : >             "David O'Brien" <obrien_at_freebsd.org> writes:
: > : > : > : Before 'fsck' would read the lable for the FS type.  That  
: > has
: > : > changed and
: > : > : > : thus you cannot just 'fsck /dev/ad1s1d' anymore.  So the FS
: > : > type in fstab
: > : > : > : must be accurate.
: > : > : >
: > : > : > Why did that change?  I routinely have disks that aren't in my
: > : > : > /etc/fstab that I mount and this is a pain in the backside.
: > : > :
: > : > : Due to r186240 which:
: > : > :     Make gpart the default partitioning class on all platforms.
: > : > :
: > : > : Seems GEOM_PART_BSD does not like labels that GEOM_BSD did.
: > : >
: > : > Then why the change?  Shouldn't we make it like them for
: > : > compatibility?
: > :
: > : David's statement is incorrect. They like the same labels
: > : for all practical purposes. The problem at hand here is
: > : that fsck(8) & newfs(8) ask of GEOM_BSD what the partition
: > : type is. This means 2 things:
: > : 1.  Any platform that doesn't use the BSD disklabel by
: > :      default needs to have a proper /etc/fstab and is not
: > :      behaving the same as i386.
: > : 2.  Switching to GPT as the default partitioning scheme
: > :      yields the same problem.
: > :
: > : As I said in an email to arch_at_, it's good to query the
: > : partition type to determine what to do when more specific
: > : information is missing (running fsck(8) vs fsck_ffs(8)).
: > : But it wasn't something that was there at the switchover
: > : point.
: >
: > But my problems are with a platform that has BSD labels, and not GPT
: > labels, with a proper BSD label on the device.
: 
: You don't have GEOM_BSD to service the DIOCGDINFO ioctl(2)
: anymore. We need to change fsck(8) so that it doesn't work
: only on BSD disk labels, but instead obtains the partition
: type (if applicable) in a more generic way so that it also
: applies to other partitioning schemes.

Agreed.  Do you have a proposal for how to do that?

Warner