Re: Alternatives to gcc (was Re: gcc 4.3: when will it become standard compiler?)

From: Alex Kozlov <spam_at_rm-rf.kiev.ua>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 08:58:47 +0200

On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 07:22:38PM -0800, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> - groff(1) needs a C++ compiler so clang is not (yet) an option
Also devd.


--
Adios

Received on Sat Jan 10 2009 - 05:58:52 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Dylan Cochran: "Re: Extattr portability?"
Previous message: Alexander Best: "Re: patch to fix burncd bug"
Maybe in reply to: FuLLBLaSTstorm: "Alternatives to gcc (was Re: gcc 4.3: when will it become standard compiler?)"
Next in thread: Michel Talon: "Re: Alternatives to gcc (was Re: gcc 4.3: when will it become standard compiler?)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:40 UTC