Re: Alternatives to gcc (was Re: gcc 4.3: when will it become standard compiler?)

Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> There was, however, the idea that the installation could be more
> packaged oriented.

Yes, this idea is perpetual, in large part because no one has stepped
up to do the work. So don't talk about it, just do it. :)

Doug

-- 

    This .signature sanitized for your protection