On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 09:01:28PM +0100, Roman Divacky wrote: > hi > > I noticed there is an update to lex/flex. The version in our tree > is ancient and there seems to be some updates (http://flex.sourceforge.net/) > > Can someone comment on the state of lex in our tree? It's not considered > a contributed software (it resides in usr.bin) but it was taken from elsewhere. > > what is our position? is it preferable for me to work on updating it or > just fixing the one bug I ran into? I would like to see a new version of flex in base, as the current version doesn't support generating reentrant code, which is needed for the lexer used in csup for tokenizing rcs files. I solved this by just including the generated lexer, but would prefer if it could be generated from the source instead. I think philip_at_ started to work on this, so you should poke him regarding the work he's already done. -- Ulf LilleengenReceived on Tue Jan 13 2009 - 10:14:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:40 UTC