Re: Alternatives to gcc (was Re: gcc 4.3: when will it become standardcompiler?)

From: Christoph Mallon <christoph.mallon_at_gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:44:48 +0100
Roman Divacky schrieb:
> 2) llvm uses special "bytecode" that gets compiled into native machine
> code so technically speaking "classic" assembler is not needed for llvm/clang.

This is an irrelevant detail for normal use.

> the chain with clang is: clang -> llvm bc -> native binary

This is just a kludge, because clang has no proper compiler driver, yet.
Received on Thu Jan 15 2009 - 11:44:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:40 UTC