On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 00:35:30 -0800, Maxim Sobolev <sobomax_at_FreeBSD.org> wrote: > Erich Dollansky wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 23:25 -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am reviewing differences between amd64 and i386 GENERIC kernels and >>> noticed that for some unclear reason we ship amd64 GENERIC with NTFS >>> module compiled in, while i386 without it. IMHO both should match. The >>> question is whether NTFS should be i386 way (opt in) or amd64 way (opt >> >> the Windows file system? >> >> I would use opt-in as most people will not need it. > > Any particular reason why not? Memory is cheap, 100-200KB of extra > kernel code doesn't really matter today, while NTFS is probably the most > widespread filesystem after MSDOS. Therefore supporting it in the > GENERIC out of the box even in the read-only mode (our NTFS driver is > read-only AFAIK) could benefit many users. > I'd like to have it loaded as a modile on demand, as soon as I try to mount_ntfs. I would throw it out of GENERIC if its up to me. Although I don't have technical arguments for throwing it out of GENERIC ;) Cheers, ./MarianReceived on Mon Jan 19 2009 - 07:55:07 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:40 UTC