In message <790a9fff0901190108r4eb3232bqfc6a0c8af8cd7c71_at_mail.gmail.com>, Scot Hetzel writes: >On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Maxim Sobolev <sobomax_at_freebsd.org> wrote: >> Erich Dollansky wrote: >> Any particular reason why not? Memory is cheap, 100-200KB of extra kernel >> code doesn't really matter today, while NTFS is probably the most widespread >> filesystem after MSDOS. Therefore supporting it in the GENERIC out of the >> box even in the read-only mode (our NTFS driver is read-only AFAIK) could >> benefit many users. >Since a buildkernel will install the ntfs.ko kernel module by default, >their is no need to have the NTFS filesystem complied into GENERIC. Seconded, we should move towards a mode modular kernel, not less. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.Received on Mon Jan 19 2009 - 08:37:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:40 UTC