On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:28:28 +0100, Christoph Mallon <christoph.mallon_at_gmx.de> wrote: > Giorgos Keramidas schrieb: >> diff -r cb9a95f8dfb3 usr.bin/cpio/cpio.c >> --- a/usr.bin/cpio/cpio.c Tue Jan 20 21:45:52 2009 +0200 >> +++ b/usr.bin/cpio/cpio.c Tue Jan 20 22:56:48 2009 +0200 >> _at__at_ -623,12 +623,12 _at__at_ >> r = archive_write_header(cpio->archive, entry); >> if (r != ARCHIVE_OK) >> - cpio_warnc(archive_errno(cpio->archive), >> + cpio_warnc(0, >> "%s: %s", >> - destpath, >> + srcpath, >> archive_error_string(cpio->archive)); > > Wouldn't it be better to remove the manually appended error string, > i.e. ": %s" ... archive_error_string(), instead of circumventing the > generic error reporting magic provided by cpio_warnc()? That's probably better. It's why I split the patch in two parts, so Tim can review them separately and pick whatever is nicer :) It might be better to use: cpio_warnc(archive_errno(cpio->archive), "%s", srcpath);Received on Tue Jan 20 2009 - 21:04:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:40 UTC