Re: panic: mutex Giant not owned at /usr/src/sys/kern/tty_ttydisc.c:1127

From: Julian Elischer <julian_at_elischer.org>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 15:14:58 -0800
Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
> Hans Petter,

>> Do mutexes sleep? No? So my code should be fine?
> 
> yes, regular mutexes sleep.

Yes and no.

This is a semantic thing..

They don't actually 'sleep', but they do deschedule the thread.

the difference is purely semantic.

Users of mutexes "agree" to never do anything that in indeterminately 
long while holding the mutex so you are SUPPOSED to get control back 
in a "short" period of time. Even if multiple mutexes have
dependencies on each other, the fact that none of them may wait
for a "long" time is suposed to guarantee that your thread should get 
control again "shortly".

It is illegal to sleep while holding a mutex. This helps enforce
this (otherwise small) distinction.

A Sleep may wait for an arbitrary amount of time.. e.g. until reboot.
so doing so with a mutex held would break the agreement.

Effectively the only real difference is that the agreement
by users to not use a mutex when things may get slow.

Spin locks are even more strict..

BTW A mutex that is waiting on a thread on another processor
may spin for a short amount of time before taking the expensive
step of descheduling the thread.
Received on Sat Jan 24 2009 - 22:14:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:41 UTC