On 2009-Jan-30 01:43:35 -0800, Maxim Sobolev <sobomax_at_freebsd.org> wrote: >Tim Kientzle wrote: >> For example, a timestamp of 1233295862.000001 >> (1233295682 seconds and 1000 nanoseconds) >> will be printed like this by mtree: >> time=1233295862.1000 >> Unsurprisingly, the mtree parsing works the same >> way in reverse. > >Given the age of mtree(8) I guess there are lot of existing mtree specs >out there who rely on this behavior. The existing code to read nanoseconds will handle either the old format or a %09d format (the for() loop that Tim added is unnecessary) so existing specs won't have a problem. I think adding leading zeroes is the correct way to proceed. -- Peter Jeremy Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:41 UTC