Re: flash10 vs f10

From: Sam Fourman Jr. <sfourman_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 13:30:56 -0500
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Renato Botelho<rbgarga_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Juergen Lock<nox_at_jelal.kn-bremen.de> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 04:40:20PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>>> Juergen Lock <nox_at_jelal.kn-bremen.de> writes:
>>>
>>> >  New patch and shar:
>>>
>>> No more comments from me, thanks!
>>
>> Ok.  Has anyone tested this yet tho?  (Besides me in a vm... :)
>
> Working fine here. 8.0-current i386
>

I saw linux-f10-flashplugin10 hit the ports tree so I decided to try it

I have a recent FreeBSD CURRENT snapshot installed

uname -a
FreeBSD  8.0-HEAD-20090601-JPSNAP FreeBSD 8.0-HEAD-20090601-JPSNAP #0:
Mon Jun  1 02:48:06 UTC 2009
root_at_build-i386-fbsd-2.allbsd.org:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
i386


I have linux-f10 installed

pkg_info | grep linux
linux_base-f10-10   Base set of packages needed in Linux mode for i386/amd64 (L


here is the error I get, is there some wiki available that details the
steps it takes to test flash10?

# cd /usr/ports/www/linux-f10-flashplugin10/
# make install
===>  linux-flashplugin-10.0r22 bsd.linux-apps.mk test failed: The
component libidn is not defined for LINUX_DIST_SUFFIX=-f10 (the
corresponding variable libidn_f10_FILE is not defined).
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/www/linux-f10-flashplugin10.


most everything else is set to defaults


Sam Fourman Jr.
Received on Wed Jul 01 2009 - 16:30:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:51 UTC