Re: nspluginwrapper patch for testing (was: Re: flash10 vs f10)

From: Alexander Best <alexbestms_at_math.uni-muenster.de>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:50:40 +0200 (CEST)
you're right. it was my mistake. i didn't apply the patch, but added the
changes manually. i probably overlooked the "2>". sorry for that. ;)

alex

Juergen Lock schrieb am 2009-07-01:
> In article
> <permail-2009070119081980e26a0b000048ca-a_best01_at_message-id.uni-muenster.de>
> you write:
> >the latest patch to get rid of the ulimit warning doesn't suppress
> >the warning
> >since it get's output to stderr and not to stdout. replacing it with
> >"ulimit
> >-s 32768 2 > /dev/null 2>&1" should work.

> You mean the patch doesn't work for you?  It already does redirect
> stderr to /dev/null (`2>/dev/null'), which works as expected when
> tested here from commandline /bin/sh and from a script, and also when
> invoking firefox after ulimit -s 16384.  If it doesn't work for you
> there
> must be something else going on...

>  Wondering...
>         Juergen
Received on Wed Jul 01 2009 - 17:50:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:51 UTC