* illoai_at_gmail.com <illoai_at_gmail.com> [2009-07-13 03:19]: > 2009/7/12 Mel Flynn <mel.flynn+fbsd.current_at_mailing.thruhere.net>: > > I do think this is worth mentioning in UPDATING, perhaps with the advice > > ("strongly recommended") to label partitions before upgrading so that one is > > not depending on device naming conventions in the first place. > > Using the extant ufsid scheme confessedly functionally equivalent > also decrease in anxiety, as fsck clears inodes and I can't tell which > partition, cos /dev/ufsid/beefbeef00f00f looks a lot like anything else > in hexidecimal: like double the symbols of octal. Actually, I recently upgraded from -stable to -current, and the fact that I did use ufsids in -stable caused problems during the upgrade, since they don't appear to work for me in -current: # ls -l /dev/ufsid total 0 crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 94 Jul 13 04:18 491f4f09c2327891 crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 90 Jul 13 04:18 494823268ce19306 crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 92 Jul 13 04:18 49482337897d46de crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 91 Jul 13 04:18 4948233c348aaa57 crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 93 Jul 13 04:18 494825678ec6ec4c # /sbin/fsck -p /dev/ufsid/4948233c348aaa57 fsck: cannot open `/dev/ufsid/4948233c348aaa57': Operation not permitted # /sbin/mount /dev/ufsid/4948233c348aaa57 /tmp mount: /dev/ufsid/4948233c348aaa57 : Operation not permitted (/dev/ufsid/4948233c348aaa57 is my /tmp, this was tested in single user mode with only / mounted ro). Fortunately I had the real device names (/dev/mirror/gm0X) still commented out in my fstab, but it definitely didn't make the upgrade any easier. glabels (used for zfs) did continue to work. AlsonReceived on Mon Jul 13 2009 - 00:54:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:51 UTC