> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 9:50 AM, barbara<barbara.xxx1975_at_libero.it> wrote: > >> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 3:23 AM, barbara<barbara.xxx1975_at_libero.it> wrote: > >> > Why portsnap doesn't provide INDEX-8? > >> > > >> > > >> > >> Hi, Barbara > >> > >> They appear on my machine: > >> > >> %ls /usr/ports/INDEX-* > >> /usr/ports/INDEX-5 /usr/ports/INDEX-7 /usr/ports/INDEX-8.bz2 > >> /usr/ports/INDEX-6 /usr/ports/INDEX-8 > > > > If you remove them, you will see that INDEX-8 is missing. > > Also check the dates of the files. > > This will make portversion misbehave. > > > > I believe that is true with anything in ${PORTSDIR} -- if you remove a > ${CATEGORY}/${PORT}, it will not be replaced through portsnap. I am > not sure if this is true for c(v)sup, as I don't use it for my ports > tree, but I expect it would restore the missing directory/files/etc. > If you remove those files and run portsnap fetch update again, you will find only fresh INDEX-[5-7]. Maybe it's caused by the fact INDEX-8 is not built on portsnap servers, but I really don't know. BarbaraReceived on Sun Jul 26 2009 - 12:09:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:52 UTC